'Mr. Chairman, You Mentioned That We Lost Knowledge…' — C-SPAN

>> Mr. Chairman, you mentioned that we lost knowledge of natural immunity. I didn't. Dr. Fauci did. I suppose I had an asymptomatic case of COVID because of the very faulty PCR test. I never got vaccinated or injected. There's no way I would have done that because I found out enough about the mRNA gene therapy. But you also brought up the issue of hospital protocols. I'm going to be holding a public event on hospital protocols. We've already received a couple of hundred testimonies. of heart-wrenching. They are heart-wrenching. Here's an excerpt from the testimony of a staff surgeon, very experienced doctor for decades at Providence Regional Medical Center, Everett, Washington. Quote, after our hospital was given remdesivir by the CDC, we were provided misleading/inaccurate information about the drug biomedical leadership. When I had a young trauma patient who was a perfect candidate for remdesivir, the infectious disease doctor on call told me to not get remdesivir. I said, nurses referred to it as run. Death is near. So again, I've always been -- I never made sense to me that we put all of our eggs in the experimental gene therapy. If you knew anything about it, you would have avoided it like a plague. And we sabotaged early treatment. The only treatment we really approved, monoclonal antibodies, which I think basically worked pretty well. But those weren't particularly available. They were denied an awful lot of patients. It was all remdesivir. Based on a study that the NIH changed the end point from mortality because it had no impact on mortality to today's recovery, a drug that the WHO recommended against its use in COVID in November of 2020, but a drug that cost over $3,000 for a course of treatment versus immunology. We had a lot of things like ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, who even Dr. Fauci, and I should have got that one out because I want to take this time to end things in the record, said we need to have a very tight protocol in remdesivir because it's unknown, but hydroxychloroquine, that's approved, some side effects, but we have a long history of it. Let's put up my latest chart. Again, I was tracking adverse events on the experimental injection. But I use this chart as a comparison. So I'm going to be talking about hydroxychloroquine. These are -- again, it doesn't improve causation, but there's correlation. It's therefore a safety signal. So ivermectin, over 30 years of FDA reports, 17 deaths per year. Hydroxychloroquine, over 38 years of reporting, 142 deaths per year. Remdesivir, over five and a half years, 546 deaths per year. The COVID injection, almost 7,000 deaths per year. Which is safest? What did the FDA freak us out about, ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, when they turn a complete blind's eye toward the injection's injury? So I want to enter the quote from the surgeon. By the way, here's the answer. Cheryl Atkinson in an interview said that when it comes to money, we check financial ties with my experts on the government panel, devising coronavirus treatment guidelines, which had the effect of dialing back hydroxychloroquine use and giving an edge to remdesivir. They had to disclose. Two were on Gilead's advisory board. Others were paid consultants. By the way, within the study, I think one of the study participants was employee of Gilead. A bunch also had conflicts with Gilead. So gee, I wonder why. Gilead made billions of dollars off remdesivir. In terms of ignoring safety signals, you can probably put that down now. This has come to light. This is Dr. Drew Weissman who got the Nobel Prize for the mRNA platform. He wrote to Dr. Fauci on February 8th of 2020. Tony, I wanted to alert you to some new data we generated with our mRNA LNP vaccine. Now, it was a higher fold dose, but that mRNA LNP go to the placenta and feed it. Dr. Fauci, he said we still have some concerns over the data after they tested IM. There's more documentation in terms of the FDA than the FDA. It's a little bit off. Don't worry about that. That was the whole thing. That's what Peter Marks did when he was shown that his algorithm was going to mass safety signals. The last thing I want to enter in the record here is -- and I want to make the point. Why is this important? That they buried the treatment of severely injection injured. The fact that we haven't acknowledged these injection injuries, these people can't get treatment. They're being gaslit by their doctors. It's all in your head. The rate of the injection injured of suicides is increasing because they've given up hope. Because our medical establishment and federal health agencies have completely failed and challenged it. So again, Dr. Nath was treating, diagnosing and treating injection injured in March of 2021. This concerned people. So you had Dr. Walter Koroshetz writes Dr. Fauci, one of the points he made. Dr. Nath has been collecting a bunch. He has reports sent out to publish. Well, that alarmed everybody. Boy, you can't let the public know what's actually happening. You can't actually let the public know what the science is showing. So on April 29th, an e-mail from Francis Collins, head of NIH, to Dr. Koroshetz says I find this approach troubling. And we'll have the main response of feeding vaccine hesitancy and social media overreaction. Then Dr. Lawrence Tabek writes to Francis Collins, I don't understand why Walter does not shut this thing down. Why don't you shut down Dr. Nath who's actually treating injection injured? Why? Because of vaccine hesitancy. And because we haven't acknowledged that. And the reason I've been advocating for this is because I know I know people who have lost loved ones within days of the injection. And we've turned our backs on them. They deserve acknowledgement. They deserve to be heard, seen and believed so they can get treatment. I also know the doctors whose careers were destroyed because you denigrated things like Ivermectin and denied Ivermectin to people in hospitals who got their kidneys knocked out by the rendezevir but got put on ventilators never got to hug their loved ones goodbye because of those hospital protocols. That's what your science did to people. So Dr. Fauci, my only question is based on your lack of testimony here today, based quite honestly on our investigation into the cover up of safety signals and injection injuries, we have issued letters to a number of former FDA officials to come in for transcribed interviews. You will be getting a letter today. Asking for a volunteer transcribed interview. So I'd be asking, will you comply or will I have to subpoena you? >> On the advice of council, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. >> Expect a subpoena. Thank you. >> Senator Scott.