Back to timeline
Verified
Policy
Funding

President Bush announces PEPFAR in the State of the Union; Fauci served as principal scientific architect

In his January 28, 2003 State of the Union address, President George W. Bush proposed the Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) — $15 billion over five years to prevent 7 million infections, treat 2 million people, and care for millions more, mainly in Africa and the Caribbean. Congress passed the United States Leadership Against HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria Act of 2003 in strong bipartisan fashion. Fauci, who had been tasked by the White House after a 2002 Africa trip, is described in the 2007 Lasker Award citation as the program's 'principal scientific architect.' (The lives-saved totals now cited — over 25 million per State Department reporting — are outcomes assessed later and are labeled as such.)

Primary quotes

Other
Tonight I propose the Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief — a work of mercy beyond all current international efforts to help the people of Africa.

President George W. Bush, 2003 State of the Union address

Other
Tony Fauci became the principal scientific architect, working with White House and other staff.

2007 Lasker Public Service Award presentation (Harvey Fineberg)

Linked sources

President Delivers 'State of the Union' — Jan. 28, 2003 (Bush WH archive)
Tier 1 · transcript · PEPFAR proposal, $15B over five years
PEPFAR Reports to Congress 2005–2022 (U.S. Dept. of State archive)
Tier 1 · other · Documents the 2003 launch and cumulative lives-saved reporting (later outcomes)
Advancements in AIDS relief and biodefense — 2007 Lasker Public Service Award citation
Tier 3 · other · Describes Fauci as PEPFAR's 'principal scientific architect'

Related contentions

The Fauci legacy: centralized scientific authority or adaptive public service?

Unresolved and actively polarized: congressional investigations and critical books press the failure-mode reading while official honors, award citations, and Fauci's own memoir press the adaptive-service reading, with no shared baseline of agreed facts between the two.