Back to timeline
Verified
Policy
Records

FDA grants full approval to remdesivir days after WHO Solidarity finds no mortality benefit

The FDA approved Gilead's Veklury (remdesivir) as the first fully approved COVID-19 treatment, for hospitalized patients 12 and older, citing three randomized trials including ACTT-1, which showed faster recovery. The decision landed one week after the WHO's Solidarity trial — an open-label trial of ~11,300 patients in 30 countries, preprinted Oct. 15 and later published in NEJM — reported remdesivir had little or no effect on mortality, ventilation, or hospital stay. Gilead and some researchers questioned Solidarity's open-label, no-placebo design; the FDA's approval rested on the placebo-controlled ACTT-1.

Primary quotes

Other
Today's approval is supported by data from multiple clinical trials that the agency has rigorously assessed and represents an important scientific milestone in the COVID-19 pandemic.

FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn

Other
These remdesivir, hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir, and interferon regimens had little or no effect on hospitalized patients with Covid-19, as indicated by overall mortality, initiation of ventilation, and duration of hospital stay.

WHO Solidarity Trial Consortium, NEJM

Linked sources

FDA Approves First Treatment for COVID-19 (Veklury/remdesivir)
Tier 1 · other · Oct. 22, 2020 full approval citing three randomized trials
Repurposed Antiviral Drugs for Covid-19 — Interim WHO Solidarity Trial Results (NEJM; PMC mirror)
Tier 1 · report · WHO Solidarity: little or no effect on mortality/ventilation/stay; nejm.org 403 to fetcher, PMC free-access copy cited
FDA approves remdesivir as first COVID-19 treatment (AP)
Tier 3 · news · Oct. 22, 2020; covers the WHO Solidarity design dispute

Related contentions

Early treatment and repurposed drugs: dismissed or properly tested?

Unresolved. The efficacy question for ivermectin in COVID-19 is largely settled against benefit in the major RCTs, but the dispute over the tone and legality of the FDA's messaging — and over whether early dismissal distorted research and prescribing — remains contested in court (Apter v. HHS, revived by the Fifth Circuit in 2023 and later settled with the FDA removing the posts) and in public debate.