Back to timeline
Verified
Records

TOGETHER trial (NEJM) finds ivermectin does not prevent COVID-19 hospitalization

The TOGETHER adaptive platform trial, published in the New England Journal of Medicine (online March 30, 2022), reported that among 1,358 high-risk outpatients in Brazil randomized to ivermectin (400 µg/kg daily for 3 days) or placebo, the composite of COVID-19 hospitalization or extended emergency-department observation was 14.7% vs 16.3% (relative risk 0.90, credible interval 0.70–1.16) — no statistically significant benefit, and none on any secondary outcome. The same month, the UK's PRINCIPLE trial posted preprint results likewise finding no meaningful benefit from ivermectin (noted here without a cited URL — the medRxiv preprint could not be fetched at ingest). Later 2022 trials (ACTIV-6, COVID-OUT) reached similar null results, and NIH guidelines recommend against ivermectin for COVID-19 outside clinical trials.

Primary quotes

Other
Treatment with ivermectin did not result in a lower incidence of medical admission to a hospital due to progression of Covid-19 or of prolonged emergency department observation among outpatients with an early diagnosis of Covid-19.

Reis et al., NEJM (TOGETHER)

Flags / open questions

  • PRINCIPLE March 2022 result was a preprint (published 2023 in Journal of Infection); noted without URL (fetch blocked)

Linked sources

Effect of Early Treatment with Ivermectin among Patients with Covid-19 (Reis et al., NEJM — TOGETHER)
Tier 1 · report · Mar. 30, 2022; no significant benefit on hospitalization/extended ED observation
Clinical Trials Show Ivermectin Does Not Benefit COVID-19 Patients, Contrary to Social Media Claims (FactCheck.org)
Tier 4 · news · Sept. 2022 synthesis of TOGETHER, ACTIV-6, COVID-OUT nulls and the continuing dispute

Related contentions

Early treatment and repurposed drugs: dismissed or properly tested?

Unresolved. The efficacy question for ivermectin in COVID-19 is largely settled against benefit in the major RCTs, but the dispute over the tone and legality of the FDA's messaging — and over whether early dismissal distorted research and prescribing — remains contested in court (Apter v. HHS, revived by the Fifth Circuit in 2023 and later settled with the FDA removing the posts) and in public debate.